Investigating cannula tip angles in pulmonary artery ECMO: A computational study on the potential benefits of angulation for oxygen delivery

Perfusion, pp. 2676591251407293

Abstract

Introduction Pulmonary artery (PA) cannulation is emerging as a method for concurrent cardiac and respiratory failure, but limited data exists on how cannula positioning, particularly cannula tip angle, affects perfusion symmetry. Due to varying pulmonary bifurcation geometry between patients, ensuring even distribution of oxygen-saturated blood becomes critical. This computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study investigated the effects of cannula positioning and angles on oxygen delivery within the PA using 6 different configurations. Method An idealized PA geometry based on a CT scan was constructed including the 6 different cannula configurations: two straight (short and long) and four angled (5° and 10° toward either pulmonary branch). Simulations assumed laminar, steady-state flow at 6 L/min total (50% ECMO contribution). Oxygen transport was modeled as a passive scalar with 75% saturation from the heart and 100% from the cannula. Perfusion symmetry was quantified using the absolute difference in mean oxygen saturation (ΔSaO 2 ) and partial pressure (ΔpO 2 ) between the right (RPA) and left pulmonary arteries (LPA). Results Cannula positioning and angulation influences oxygen distribution within the PA. Straight-tipped cannulas favored LPA-sided flow due to the natural geometry of the pulmonary artery (ΔSaO 2 = 12.9–15.1%). A 5° RPA directed angulation achieved the most symmetric distribution (ΔSaO 2 = 9.2%, ΔpO 2 = 14.2 mmHg), whereas greater or opposite angulations increased flow asymmetry. Conclusion Minor cannula tip angulation, specifically 5° deflection towards the RPA, enhances bilateral PA oxygenation without increasing ECMO flow, providing a simple yet effective strategy for optimizing pulmonary ECMO perfusion.

Authors 7

1. Eiman Shah Aachen

   FH Aachen

   Affiliation as printed

   University of Applied Sciences Aachen

2. Jan Wilhelm Spillner Aachen

   Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   RWTH Aachen University Hospital

3. Johannes Greven Aachen

   Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   RWTH Aachen University Hospital

4. Annika Schmitz Aachen

   FH Aachen

   Affiliation as printed

   University of Applied Sciences Aachen

5. Andreas J. Horbach Aachen

   FH Aachen

   Affiliation as printed

   University of Applied Sciences Aachen

6. Yvan Fournier

   Électricité de France (France)

   Affiliation as printed

   EDF R&D

7. Mehdi Behbahani corresponding Aachen

   FH Aachen

   Affiliation as printed

   University of Applied Sciences Aachen