A

Double descent: When do neural quantum states generalize?

Physical review. E, vol. 113, pp. 045303

Abstract

Neural quantum states (NQS) provide flexible and compact wave-function parametrizations for numerical studies of quantum many-body physics. In particular, NQS aim to circumvent the exponential scaling of the Hilbert space by compressing quantum many-body wave functions with a tractable amount of parameters. While inspired by deep learning, it remains unclear to what extent NQS share characteristics with neural networks used for standard machine learning tasks. We demonstrate that, in a simplified supervised setting, NQS exhibit the double descent phenomenon, a key feature of modern deep learning, where generalization worsens as network size increases before improving again in an overparameterized regime. Notably, we find the second descent to occur only for network sizes much larger than the Hilbert space dimension, i.e., network sizes that are out of reach for problems of practical interest. Within our setting, this observation places typical NQS in the underparameterized regime. We also observe that the optimal network size in the underparameterized regime depends on the number of unique training samples. While the double descent phenomenon does indeed translate to the NQS setting, potential practical consequences of our findings point more toward the need for symmetry-aware, physics-informed architecture design, rather than directly adopting machine learning heuristics.

Authors 6

  1. University of Waterloo · Perimeter Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Perimeter Institute

    University of Waterloo

  2. Flatiron Institute · New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    Flatiron Institute

    New York University

  3. University of Geneva · École Polytechnique · Collège de France · Centre de Physique Théorique · Flatiron Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    CPHT

    Collège de France

    Flatiron Institute

    Université de Genève

    École Polytechnique

  4. Flatiron Institute · New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    Flatiron Institute

    New York University

  5. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science

    Universiteit Leiden

  6. Flatiron Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Flatiron Institute

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0