A

Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie, vol. 60, pp. e407–e408

Abstract

Background and goal Surgical resection forms the mainstay of curative treatment for liver cancers. The laparoscopic approach in major liver resections is increasingly being performed. Randomized evidence to show superiority of laparoscopic compared to open hemihepatectomy for perioperative and oncological outcomes is lacking. Methods Patients undergoing hemihepatectomy were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to laparoscopic or open surgery, stratified for hemihepatectomy side and center, in 16 centers across Europe with established enhanced recovery programs. The primary endpoint was time to functional recovery, defined as being independently mobile with adequate oral intake, oral pain relief, no intravenous fluids, and normalized blood biochemistry. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, postoperative 90-day morbidity, 90-day mortality and disease-free and overall survival. Results : From October 2013 to January 2019, 352 out of 829 eligible patients underwent randomization, 177 patients to laparoscopic and 175 patients to open hemihepatectomy, 119 left and 213 right. Excluding patients who could not proceed to surgery, a total of 332 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Malignancy was diagnosed in 281 (85%) patients of whom 166 (59%) had colorectal liver metastases. Median time to functional recovery was 4 days (interquartile range 3 to 5) in the laparoscopic group compared to 5 days (interquartile range 4 to 6) in the open group (mean difference, -17.5%; 96% confidence interval -25.6 to -8.4; P<0.001). Median length of hospital stay was 5 days (interquartile range 4 to 7) in the laparoscopic group compared to 6 days (interquartile range 5 to 7) in the open group (mean difference, -16.4%; 99% confidence interval -27.7 to -3.9; P=0.002). Operation time was 310 minutes in the laparoscopic group compared to 254 minutes in the open group (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative 90-day morbidity, mortality, and overall survival. Conclusions: Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy is superior to open hemihepatectomy in terms of time to functional recovery and length of hospital stay within an enhanced recovery setting without differences in morbidity and mortality. Publication History Article published online: 19 August 2022 © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Authors 19

  1. Maastricht University Medical Centre

    Affiliation as printed

    Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Niederlande

  2. Affiliation as printed

    San Raffaele, Milan, Italien

  3. Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

    Affiliation as printed

    Poliambulanzia hospital, Brescia, Italien

  4. University of Naples Federico II

    Affiliation as printed

    Federico II University, Napels, Italien

  5. Affiliation as printed

    Univeristy Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, Vereinigtes Königreich

  6. Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    AMC, Amsterdam, Niederlande

  7. National Health Service · Plymouth Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Plymouth Hospital NHS, Plymouth, Vereinigtes Königreich

  8. King's College Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    King's College Hospital NHS, London, Vereinigtes Königreich

  9. Oslo University Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norwegen

  10. AZ Groeninge

    Affiliation as printed

    AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgien

  11. Affiliation as printed

    Hopitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgien

  12. TF Ulmer Aachen

    Universitätsklinikum Aachen

    Affiliation as printed

    Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland

  13. UP Neumann Aachen

    Maastricht University Medical Centre · Universitätsklinikum Aachen

    Affiliation as printed

    Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Niederlande

    Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland

  14. Aintree University Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Aintree University Hospital NHS, Liverpool, Vereinigtes Königreich

  15. University of Oxford · Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

    Affiliation as printed

    Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, Vereinigtes Königreich

  16. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle, Vereinigtes Königreich

  17. Jessa Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgien

  18. Bram Olij Aachen

    Maastricht University Medical Centre · Universitätsklinikum Aachen

    Affiliation as printed

    Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Niederlande

    Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland

  19. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

    Affiliation as printed

    Southampton University Hospital NHS, Southampton, Vereinigtes Königreich

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 0