Decoding AI ethics: What do ethical tools tell us about ethics?

Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 27

Abstract

Abstract This study performs a systematic content analysis to map out the landscape of eighty-seven ethical tools concerning the type of ethical principles addressed, the approach promoted (technological vs. socio-technical vs. societal), and the kind of assessment endorsed (self-assessment versus assessment by others). The findings reveal a skewed representation and emphasis of specific ethical principles across these tools. Furthermore, ethical tools primarily advocate for a technological or socio-technical approach. In contrast, only a few ethical tools emphasize the importance of a societal approach. Additionally, the research highlights a reliance on self-assessments within these tools, raising concerns about the objectivity and comprehensiveness of ethical evaluations in AI development. Our findings add empirical support to recent AI and ethics research advocating for bottom-up approaches that embrace diverse perspectives, challenging the dominance of broadly stated ethical principles, diagnostic tools, and an overreliance on self-assessments.

Authors 4

1. Tijs C. Portegies corresponding

   University of Amsterdam · Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

   Affiliation as printed

   Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands

   University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

2. Oumaima Hajri Aachen

   Leiden University

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

3. Lotte M. Willemsen

   University of Amsterdam · Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

   Affiliation as printed

   Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands

   University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

4. Maaike Harbers

   Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

   Affiliation as printed

   Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands