Higher-order discontinuous Galerkin splitting schemes for fluids with variable viscosity

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 448, pp. 118497

Abstract

• Velocity-correction method for incompressible flows with non-constant viscosity • Robust and accurate higher-order discontinuous Galerkin discretization • Matrix-free finite element solver with hp-multigrid preconditioner • Detailed comparison of (non-)linear projection-based and monolithic solver performance • IMEX and projection schemes are faster, but potentially less accurate This article investigates matrix-free higher-order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible flows with variable viscosity. The viscosity field may be prescribed analytically or governed by a rheological law, as often found in biomedical or industrial applications. The DG discretization of the adapted second-order viscous terms is carried out via the symmetric interior penalty Galerkin method, obviating auxiliary variables. Based on this spatial discretization, we compare several linearized variants of saddle point block systems and projection-based splitting time integration schemes in terms of their computational performance. Compared to the velocity-pressure block-system for the former, the splitting scheme allows solving a sequence of simple problems such as mass, convection-diffusion and Poisson equations. We investigate under which conditions the improved temporal stability of fully implicit schemes and resulting expensive nonlinear solves outperform the splitting schemes and linearized variants that are stable under hyperbolic time step restrictions. The key aspects of this work are i) a higher-order DG discretization for incompressible flows with variable viscosity, ii) accelerated nonlinear solver variants and suitable linearizations adopting a matrix-free h p -multigrid solver, and iii) a detailed comparison of the monolithic and projection-based solvers in terms of their (non-)linear solver performance. The presented schemes are evaluated in a series of numerical examples verifying their spatial and temporal accuracy, and the preconditioner performance under increasing viscosity contrasts, while their efficiency is showcased in the backward-facing step benchmark.

Authors 4

1. Richard Schussnig corresponding

   Ruhr University Bochum

   Affiliation as printed

   Faculty of Mathematics, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany

2. Niklas Fehn

   University of Augsburg

   Affiliation as printed

   Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Germany

3. Douglas R. Q. Pacheco Aachen Chair for Computational Analysis of Technical Systems (CATS)

   RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   Chair for Computational Analysis of Technical Systems, RWTH Aachen University, Germany

4. Martin Kronbichler

   Ruhr University Bochum

   Affiliation as printed

   Faculty of Mathematics, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany