A

Interpretable machine learning for identifying ICU readmission risk in subgroups with probabilistic rules

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 33, pp. 690–699

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Estimating readmission risk for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is critical for clinicians to optimize resource allocation and prevent premature discharges. Machine learning models currently applied to this task either lack interpretability or cannot identify patient subgroups with distinctive readmission risks and characteristics. We addressed this gap by introducing a cutting-edge rule-based model, namely truly unordered rule sets (TURS), to reveal heterogeneous readmission risks and subgroup-level patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We trained TURS on all ICU admissions from January 2011 to January 2020 at Leiden University Medical Center. For each subgroup, patient characteristics and the influence of feature variables on readmission risk were analyzed. RESULTS: TURS identified subgroups with heterogeneous feature distributions and feature importance, providing actionable insights for ICU discharge planning. Its predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC-AUC] 70.5%) and model complexity (5 rules, average length 2) surpassed other rule-based models. DISCUSSION: Subgroup analysis highlighted the heterogeneity of patients. First, we compared the conditional probability distribution of each feature variable, conditioned on the fact that a patient was in a certain subgroup, with its unconditional distribution. We identified features deviating from the unconditional distribution, illustrating unique subgroup-specific implications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that features with the highest impact on the readmission risk were distinctive for each subgroup. CONCLUSION: The TURS model provided a concise summary of patient subgroups, aiding ICU discharge decisions and advancing knowledge discovery in the ICU.

Authors 4

  1. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University , 2333 CC, Leiden,

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center , 2333 ZA, Leiden,

    Healthplus.ai B.V. , 1013 NH, Amsterdam,

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Healthplus.ai B.V., 1013 NH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center , 2333 ZA, Leiden,

    Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center , 2333 ZA, Leiden,

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University , 2333 CC, Leiden,

    Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 23