A

Content evaluation of the inclusive eHealth guide: how to develop interventions for people with a lower socioeconomic position?

Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 7, pp. 1528860

Abstract

Objectives: eHealth interventions favor those with higher socio-economic positions (SEPs). This can widen disparities, as people with lower SEPs may lack resources and face digital or financial barriers, making tailored solutions necessary. This study evaluates professionals' perceptions of the Inclusive eHealth Guide (IeG) regarding its content. The aim was to ensure it meets the needs of professionals and the targeted lower SEP demographic, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Methods: This mixed-method study used qualitative research through semi-structured interviews and the think-aloud method with 13 professionals involved in eight different eHealth lifestyle interventions using the eHealth guide. Quantitative feedback was obtained through a survey with evaluative multiple-choice questions. Participants evaluated the IeG at various stages. They identified positive aspects and points for improvement, and provided recommendations for the guide's content and structure. Results: Participants valued the IeG's practicality and comprehensiveness, noting its usefulness in developing accessible eHealth solutions for populations with lower SEP. They suggested improving content clarity, expanding informational depth, and refining the guide's structure. Conclusions: The IeG has potential as a valuable tool for professionals developing eHealth interventions for lower SEP populations. Continuous refinement is crucial to ensure the guide remains relevant and effective, contributing to reducing health disparities.

Authors 11

  1. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  2. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  3. Jasper S Faber corresponding

    Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

  4. Windesheim University of Applied Sciences

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Health Care and Social Work, University of Applied Sciences Windesheim, Zwolle, Netherlands

  5. Erasmus MC · Capri Hartrevalidatie

    Affiliation as printed

    Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, Leiden, Netherlands

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  6. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

  7. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  8. Affiliation as printed

    NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics (NIPED), Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Vital10, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  9. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

  10. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

    National EHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Centre, Netherlands

  11. Leiden University · Medical Delta · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

    Medical Delta, Leiden University, Delft University of Technology, Erasmus University, Delft, Netherlands

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 34