A

Protostellar Jets in Star Cluster Formation and Evolution. I. Implementation and Initial Results

The Astronomical Journal, vol. 172, pp. 12

Abstract

Abstract Stars form in clusters from the gravitational collapse of giant molecular clouds, which is opposed by a variety of physical processes, including stellar feedback. The interplay between these processes determines the star formation rate of the clouds. To study how feedback controls star formation, we use a numerical framework that is optimized to simulate star cluster formation and evolution. This framework, called Torch , combines the magnetohydrodynamical code FLASH with N-body and stellar evolution codes in the Astrophysical Multipurpose Software Environment (AMUSE). Torch includes stellar feedback from ionizing and nonionizing radiation, stellar winds, and supernovae, but, until now, did not include protostellar jets. We present our implementation of protostellar jet feedback within the Torch framework and describe its free parameters. We then demonstrate our new module by comparing cluster formation simulations with and without jets. We find that the inclusion of protostellar jets slows star formation, even in clouds of up to M = 2 × 10 4 M ⊙ . We also find that the star formation rate of our lower-mass clouds ( M = 5 × 10 3 M ⊙ ) is strongly affected by both the inclusion of protostellar jets and the chosen jet parameters, including the jet lifetime and injection velocity. We follow the energy budget for each simulation and find that the inclusion of jets systematically increases the kinetic energy of the gas at early times. The implementation of protostellar jet feedback in Torch opens new areas of investigation regarding the role of feedback in star cluster formation and evolution.

Authors 11

  1. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · American Museum of Natural History

    Affiliation as printed

    American Museum of Natural History

    Rutgers University

  2. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Flatiron Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Flatiron Institute

    Rutgers University

  3. American Museum of Natural History · Drexel University

    Affiliation as printed

    American Museum of Natural History

    Drexel University

  4. American Museum of Natural History

    Affiliation as printed

    American Museum of Natural History

  5. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics · McMaster University

    Affiliation as printed

    Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

    McMaster University

  6. Drexel University

    Affiliation as printed

    Drexel University

  7. Drexel University

    Affiliation as printed

    Drexel University

  8. American Museum of Natural History · Heidelberg University

    Affiliation as printed

    American Museum of Natural History

    Universität Heidelberg

  9. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

  10. University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Wisconsin–Madison

  11. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0