A

Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Evidence‐Based Clinical Guidelines: Methodological Guidance Report

Clinical and Public Health Guidelines, vol. 2, pp. e70046

Abstract

Introduction: The global healthcare sector significantly contributes to climate change and other environmental impacts. Despite this, environmental sustainability considerations are often missing from evidence-based clinical guidelines. To address this gap, we developed a methodological guidance report focused on integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines. Methods: An interdisciplinary expert panel systematically developed this methodological guidance report. Data collection involved expert panel meetings and consultations with stakeholders, based on the development of a sustainability guideline focused on reducing the environmental impact of the operating room (OR). The process included an initial inventory and prioritisation phase, guideline development following the GRADE approach, and finalisation and publication. Results: The generated insights offer a standardised and readily applicable guidance report for integrating environmental sustainability into clinical guidelines across medical disciplines. This allows guideline developers to implement sustainability considerations in clinical guidelines. Environmental sustainability should be addressed at the start of guideline development, involving interdisciplinary experts. Approaches include integrating environmental outcomes into the PICO framework or adding a search question focused on the environmental impact of interventions. Furthermore, environmental sustainability should be integrated in the Evidence-to-Decision framework. If LCAs are included, both the critical appraisal for study quality of LCAs and the GRADE approach for quality of the evidence are recommended. Interpretation: This methodological guidance report facilitates a stepwise approach of integrating environmental sustainability into clinical practice through evidence-based guideline development. While further evaluation and implementation in clinical practice is needed, the framework supports more sustainable clinical decision-making and contributes to promoting planetary health.

Authors 7

  1. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands

  2. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Department of Industrial Ecology Leiden University Leiden the Netherlands

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Department of Industrial Ecology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

  3. University of Amsterdam · Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Amsterdam Public Health

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Public Health Institute University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

    Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands

    Amsterdam Public Health Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  4. Zorginstituut Nederland

    Affiliation as printed

    National Health Care Institute Diemen the Netherlands

    National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands

  5. Affiliation as printed

    Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists Utrecht the Netherlands

    Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  6. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biomechanical Engineering Technical University (TU) Delft Delft the Netherlands

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands

    Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical University (TU) Delft, Delft, the Netherlands

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands

  7. Affiliation as printed

    Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists Utrecht the Netherlands

    Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Cited by 2 stored of 2

2 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 34