A

Linking French wh -in-situ and context: a choice function analysis

Probus, vol. 38, pp. 251–288

Abstract

Abstract French wh -in-situ questions may be infelicitous when a quantifier or focus expression precedes the in-situ wh -phrase (‘intervention effects’). However, these intervention effects are absent in a certain type of context. This paper offers an account of French wh -in-situ questions that explains the role of context. We propose that French wh -phrases can be interpreted in-situ by means of a contextually bound choice function. We further hypothesise that, due to an ongoing process of language change, there are two groups of French speakers. Both groups can interpret wh -in-situ via the choice function but one group may additionally use covert movement. We show how the choice function account along with this ‘Two speaker groups hypothesis’ accounts for the effect of context on intervention effects, as well as several other longstanding debates regarding the semantics and prosody of French wh -in-situ questions.

Authors 3

  1. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Languages and Academic Skills , Delft University of Technology , Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX , Delft , The Netherlands

  2. Jenny Doetjes Aachen

    Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University , Reuvensplaats 3-4, 2311 BE , Leiden , The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University , Reuvensplaats 3-4, 2311 BE , Leiden , The Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 46