A

Linking Individual Performance to Density‐Dependent Population Dynamics to Understand Temperature‐Mediated Genotype Coexistence

Ecology Letters, vol. 28, pp. e70214

Abstract

The persistence of local populations exposed to climate change depends on their adaptive potential and on the ability of local individuals to compete with migrating conspecifics tracking environmental shifts. Modern coexistence theory (MCT) offers a framework for studying such competitive interactions among genotypes. However, MCT often focuses on emerging population-level outcomes, aggregating over the underlying individual-level interactions. We present a cross-scale application of MCT, combining it with an Integral Projection Model (IPM), explicitly connecting individual performance to population-level dynamics. We parameterise our model using experimental data on competing Daphnia genotypes from two latitudes. Consistent with observations, our model shows that higher temperatures increase the likelihood of competitive exclusion of Northern genotypes by Southern genotypes. Moreover, it reveals latitudinal variation in neonate sex ratios as a driver of temperature-dependent evolutionary shifts. By identifying vital rates underlying population-level competitive outcomes, our approach preserves the straightforward theoretical interpretability of MCT, while providing enhanced process-level resolution through IPMs.

Authors 10

  1. Marjolein Bruijning corresponding

    University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

  2. Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries · Freie Universität Berlin · KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Biology Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany

    Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

    Leibniz Institüt für Gewasserökologie Und Binnenfischerei (IGB) Berlin Germany

  3. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences Leiden University Leiden the Netherlands

  4. Norwegian University of Science and Technology · CICERO Center for International Climate Research

    Affiliation as printed

    CICERO Center for International Climate Research Oslo Norway

    Department of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway

  5. KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

  6. Nord University

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture Nord University Bodø Norway

  7. Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries · KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

    Leibniz Institüt für Gewasserökologie Und Binnenfischerei (IGB) Berlin Germany

  8. Vrije Universiteit Brussel · KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

    Research Group Ecology, Evolution and Genetics (bDIV) Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

  9. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway

  10. Radboud University Nijmegen · Netherlands Institute of Ecology

    Affiliation as printed

    Animal Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology Wageningen the Netherlands

    Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences Radboud University Nijmegen the Netherlands

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 81