Knowledge-Driven Hallucination in Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Process Modeling
Abstract
The utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) in analytical tasks is rooted in their vast pre-trained knowledge, which allows them to interpret ambiguous inputs and infer missing information. However, this same capability introduces a critical risk of what we term knowledgedriven hallucination: a phenomenon where the model's output contradicts explicit source evidence because it is overridden by the model's generalized internal knowledge. This paper investigates this phenomenon by evaluating LLMs on the task of automated process modeling, where the goal is to generate a formal business process model from a given source artifact. The domain of Business Process Management (BPM) provides an ideal context for this study, as many core business processes follow standardized patterns, making it likely that LLMs possess strong pre-trained schemas for them. We conduct a controlled experiment designed to create scenarios with deliberate conflict between provided evidence and the LLM's background knowledge. We use inputs describing both standard and deliberately atypical process structures to measure the LLM's fidelity to the provided evidence. Our work provides a methodology for assessing this critical reliability issue and raises awareness of the need for rigorous validation of AI-generated artifacts in any evidence-based domain.
Authors 3
-
Alessandro Berti Aachen
RWTH Aachen University · Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology
Affiliation as printed
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT, Schloss Birlinghoven
RWTH Aachen University
-
Humam Kourani Aachen
RWTH Aachen University · Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology
Affiliation as printed
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT, Schloss Birlinghoven
RWTH Aachen University
-
Wil M. P. van der Aalst Aachen
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University
Cited by 0 stored of 1
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).