A

Why do women pursue a Ph.D. in Computer Science?

Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 231, pp. 112586

Abstract

Context: Computer science, even now, attracts a small number of women, and the proportion of women in the field decreases through advancing career stages. Consequently, few women progress to Ph.D. studies in computer science after completing master’s studies. Empowering women at this stage in their careers is essential, not just for equality reasons, but to unlock untapped potential for society, industry and academia. Objective: This paper aims to identify students’ career assumptions and information related to Ph.D. studies focused on gender-based differences. We propose a program to inform female master students about Ph.D. studies that explains the process, clarifies misconceptions, and alleviates concerns. Method: An extensive survey was conducted to identify factors that encourage and discourage students from undertaking Ph.D. studies. The analysis identified statistically significant differences between those who undertook Ph.D. studies and those who did not, as well as statistically significant gender differences. A catalogue of questions to initiate discussions with potential Ph.D. students which allowed them to explore these factors was developed. These were structured into a Women’s Career Lunch program where students can explore and discuss the benefits of Ph.D. study. Results: Encouraging factors towards Ph.D. study include interest and confidence in research arising from a research involvement during earlier studies; enthusiasm for and self-confidence in computer science in addition to an interest in an academic career; encouragement from external sources; and a positive perception towards Ph.D. studies which can involve achieving personal goals. Discouraging factors include uncertainty and lack of knowledge of the Ph.D. process, a perception of lower job flexibility, and the requirement for long-term commitment. Gender differences highlighted that female students who pursue a Ph.D. have less confidence in their technical skills than males but a higher preference for interdisciplinary areas. Female students are less inclined than males to perceive the industry as offering better job opportunities and more flexible career paths than academia. Conclusions: The insights collected from the survey facilitated the development of a questions catalogue structured into the Women Career Lunch program to help students make a more informed decision concerning whether they should pursue a Ph.D. in computer science. Localised versions of this program, in 8 languages, were created to support its adoption in different countries and assist in mitigating the female under-representation challenge.

Authors 16

  1. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  2. Miguel Goulão corresponding

    Laboratório para a Ciência da Computação e Informática · Universidade Nova de Lisboa

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA LINCS, Lisboa, Portugal

  3. University of Belgrade

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

  4. Technological University Dublin

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Computer Science, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

  5. International University of Sarajevo

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

  6. Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

    Affiliation as printed

    V.V. Popovskyy Department of Infocommunication Engineering, Faculty of Infocommunications, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Kharkiv, Ukraine

  7. International University of Sarajevo

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

  8. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Université Côte d'Azur · Laboratoire d'Informatique, Signaux et Systèmes de Sophia Antipolis

    Affiliation as printed

    Université Côte d’Azur, Laboratoire I3S - CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, France

  9. University of Bamberg

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty Information Systems and Applied Computer Sciences, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

  10. KTH Royal Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, Division of Theoretical Computer Science, of the KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

  11. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  12. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  13. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  14. Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Electronical Engineering, Telecommunications and Computers, ISEL, Lisbon School of Engineering, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

  15. Adıyaman University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Adiyaman, Turkiye

  16. KTH Royal Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, Division of Theoretical Computer Science, of the KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 57