A

Spectral computed tomography thermometry for thermal ablation: applicability and needle artifact reduction

Physica Medica, vol. 137, pp. 105093

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective thermal ablation of liver tumors requires precise monitoring of the ablation zone. Computed tomography (CT) thermometry can non-invasively monitor lethal temperatures but suffers from metal artifacts caused by ablation equipment. PURPOSE: This study assesses spectral CT thermometry's applicability during microwave ablation, comparing the reproducibility, precision, and accuracy of attenuation-based versus physical density-based thermometry. Furthermore, it identifies optimal metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods: O-MAR, deep learning-MAR, spectral CT, and combinations thereof. METHODS: Four gel phantoms embedded with temperature sensors underwent a 10- minute, 60 W microwave ablation imaged by dual-layer spectral CT scanner in 23 scans over time. For each scan attenuation-based and physical density-based temperature maps were reconstructed. Attenuation-based and physical density-based thermometry models were tested for reproducibility over three repetitions; a fourth repetition focused on accuracy. MAR techniques were applied to one repetition to evaluate temperature precision in artifact-corrupted slices. RESULTS: , with coefficients of variation of 2.3 % and 6.7 %, respectively. Physical density maps improved temperature precision in presence of needle artifacts by 73 % compared to attenuation images. O-MAR improved temperature precision with 49 % compared to no MAR. Attenuation-based thermometry yielded narrower Bland-Altman limits-of-agreement (-7.7 °C to 5.3 °C) than physical density-based thermometry. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral physical density-based CT thermometry at 150 keV, utilized alongside O-MAR, enhances temperature precision in presence of metal artifacts and achieves reproducible temperature measurements with high accuracy.

Authors 9

  1. Lennart R. Koetzier corresponding Aachen

    Leiden University Medical Center · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands. Electronic address: lennartkoetzier@gmail.com

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands

  4. Philips (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Clinical Science Europe, Philips Healthcare, Veenpluis 6, 5684 PC Best, the Netherlands

  5. Isala

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Isala, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands

  6. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands

  7. University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands

  8. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands

  9. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands

Cited by 1 stored of 2

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 47