A

Revealing the interplay between decarbonisation, circularity, and cost-effectiveness in building energy renovation

Nature Communications, vol. 16, pp. 7153

Abstract

Building energy renovation mitigates carbon emissions but often increases material demand and financial costs. This work addresses this problem by investigating the carbon, material, and economic footprints of various renovation scenarios in the Dutch residential sector from 2015 to 2050. Results show that, compared to the baseline, façade refurbishment could lower cumulative lifecycle emissions by up to 0.3%, while raising material use by 21–25% and costs by 2–6%. Sensitivity analysis indicates that refurbishing the heating system offers greater potential for reducing carbon emissions. Rebuilding could cut emissions by up to 17% under an ambitious energy transition, though this would triple material use and construction costs. Circularity strategies could offset up to 89% of the material footprint and reduce carbon emissions by up to 23%. Nonetheless, considerable cost increases from renovations remain inevitable, even with advanced material circulation systems, suggesting circular renovation strategies with enhanced incentives as concerted action. This study shows that while deep building renovation could reduce carbon emissions, it increases material use and costs. Circular strategies help reduce primary material demand, but incentives are needed to make renovation economically viable.

Authors 10

  1. Leiden University · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  2. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands. hu@cml.leidenuniv.nl

  3. Leiden University · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  4. Paul Scherrer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Technology Assessment Group, Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland

  5. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  6. Xi'an Jiaotong University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shanxi, China

  7. Leiden University · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  8. Leiden University · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  9. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

  10. Leiden University · Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands. tukker@cml.leidenuniv.nl

    Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Den Haag, Netherlands. tukker@cml.leidenuniv.nl

Cited by 25 stored of 25

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 56