A

Online knapsack with removal and recourse

Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 155, pp. 103697

Abstract

We analyze the competitive ratio of the proportional online knapsack problem with removal and limited recourse. In contrast to the classical online knapsack problem, packed items can be removed and a limited number of removed items can be re-inserted to the knapsack. The variant with removal only was analyzed by Iwama and Taketomi (ICALP, 2002). We show that even a single use of recourse can improve the performance of an algorithm. We give lower bounds for a constant number of k ≥ 1 uses of recourse in total, matching upper bounds for 1 ≤ k ≤ 3 , and a general upper bound for any value of k . For a variant where a constant number of k ≥ 1 uses of recourse can be used per step, we give tight bounds for all k ≥ 1 . We further look at a scenario where an algorithm is informed when the instance ends and give improved upper bounds in both variants for this case.

Authors 6

  1. ETH Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 6, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Université de Bordeaux · Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique

    Affiliation as printed

    CNRS, LaBRI, Université de Bordeaux, 351, cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence CEDEX, France

  3. University of Augsburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Computer Science, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 6a, 86159 Augsburg, Germany

  4. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Departement of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University, Ahornstraße 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany

  5. Moritz Stocker corresponding

    ETH Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 6, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

  6. ETH Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 6, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 28