A

Observational Constraints on Mycorrhizal Nutrient Acquisition Reduce Future Land Carbon Sink Projections

Abstract

Accurately projecting the global carbon cycle requires Earth System Models (ESMs) to represent plant nutrient acquisition and associated carbon costs. However, most ESMs either neglect or oversimplify the role of mycorrhizal fungi, despite their key function in mediating plant-soil nutrient exchanges. Here, we integrate global satellite and field-based datasets on mycorrhizal distributions, soil nitrogen content, and carbon allocation to fungi to constrain nutrient acquisition costs in a land surface model, the Community Land Model (CLM). Incorporating these spatially explicit mycorrhizal costs reduces projected global carbon uptake by 15% over the 21st century. We find that mycorrhizal efficiency varies strongly by biome, with especially high carbon costs in boreal and semi-arid ecosystems. Model performance also improves by 5% in reproducing observed energy, water, and carbon fluxes. These results highlight the critical role of mycorrhizal symbioses in shaping ecosystem carbon balance and underscore the need to integrate fine-scale belowground data together with remote sensing into ESM frameworks for more accurate climate projections.

Authors 11

  1. Renato K. Braghiere corresponding

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory

  2. Society for the Protection of Underground Networks

    Affiliation as printed

    Society for the Protection of Underground Networks

  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

  4. University of Cape Town

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Cape Town

  5. CICERO Center for International Climate Research

    Affiliation as printed

    CICERO Center for International Climate Research

  6. Chapman University

    Affiliation as printed

    Chapman University

  7. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

  8. Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology

  9. Indiana University Bloomington

    Affiliation as printed

    Indiana University Bloomington

  10. California Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    California Institute of Technology

  11. California Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    California Institute of Technology

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0