MetaROR

Abstract

There are well-known complexities and challenges in current research evaluation approaches. One of these being that traditional evaluation methods, including rankings and binary publication decisions, often fail to capture the diverse value of research. However, implementing alternative evaluation approaches at scale poses significant practical resource barriers, (e.g., cost and time). A potential solution to this challenge involves multi-dimensional assessment, evaluating publications on criteria including validity, relevance, impact, ethics, and transparency. The MetaROR and AMOS are actively collaborating with RoRI partners, publishers, and meta science researchers to address these evaluation challenges through a platform that embeds the "publish, review, curate" model. The model offers better support towards knowledge creation by adopting a multi-dimensional approach to evaluation. The central message of the webinar looked at how MetaROR can offer an alternative for research evaluation while crucially remaining practical and applicable for use in contexts where large-scale evaluation is needed, including funding allocation, recruitment, and promotion. For more information on MetaROR and to contact the team, please visit .

Authors 0

1. Author list not loaded yet.