Partner familiarity enhances performance in a manual precision task

Scientific Reports, vol. 15, pp. 23381

Abstract

Understanding human collaborative behavior in tasks with physical interaction is essential for advancing physical human-robot collaboration. Investigating how individuals learn to collaborate over repeated interactions can provide valuable insights for developing robotic agents capable of gradually improving coordination and collaboration performance. Therefore, this study investigated learning behavior in a high-precision task over repeated haptic collaboration. Specifically, we examined if learned collaboration behavior is partner-specific, what collaboration strategies are developed, and if interpersonal differences affect collaboration. Our results indicate that repeated physical collaboration with the same partner allowed for immediate high performance with a familiar partner in subsequent collaborations, whereas adapting to an unfamiliar partner required retraining. Participants used partner-specific collaboration behaviors-in terms of motions and forces-that could be retained in subsequent interactions. Collaborators reduced the variability of their arm motions over repeated collaboration, achieving higher performance, likely due to increased predictability. Collaboration also enabled knowledge transfer between partners, with individual improvement being enhanced when paired with a better-performing partner. These findings suggest that partners in a collaborative precision task optimize their performance by gradually negotiating a joint action strategy, which is reused in subsequent collaborations with familiar partners and carries over to solo task execution.

Authors 7

1. Johannes Heidersberger corresponding

   TU Wien

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria. johannes.heidersberger@tuwien.ac.at

2. Jakob Kaiser

   TU Wien · Nürnberg Institut für Marktentscheidungen e.V.

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

   Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions, Nuremberg, Germany

3. Shail Jadav

   TU Wien

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

4. Lucija Mihić Zidar

   TU Wien

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

5. Arianna Curioni

   University of Vienna · TU Wien

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

   Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

6. Leif Johannsen Aachen Department of Cognition and Experimental Psychology Institute of Psychology

   RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Cognition and Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

7. Dongheui Lee

   TU Wien · Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)

   Affiliation as printed

   Autonomous Systems Lab, Institute of Computer Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

   Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Weßling, Germany