A CAP on ambitions: Power, fragmentation, and the struggle for transformative policy in the post-2022 common agricultural policy debates
NJAS Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences, vol. 97
Abstract
In recent years, academics and practitioners have questioned whether the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the best instrument to deal with social and environmental transformations. Stakeholders have faced stagnating policy debates and have seen ambitious plans being watered down. In this article, we analyse the post-2022 CAP policy debates regarding policy configurations and content. It provides insights into the key policy topics discussed during the debates, stakeholder interactions, and patterns of inclusion and exclusion. The results show that the agri-food policy community did not change its status quo despite efforts to include new actors and meanings. Four patterns of exclusion stand out: (1) fixed rules of interaction, (2) disqualification of actors and meanings, (3) ideational deadlock, and (4) restrictive language. Hence, the post-2022 CAP debates did not differ much from previous debates, blocking systemic changes.
Authors 3
-
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
-
Gerard E. Breeman Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
-
Martina G. Vijver Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
Cited by 1 stored of 1
1 result
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).