A framework for assessing and enhancing product circularity by translating circular design criteria into measurable requirements
Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 58, pp. 75–90
Abstract
The transition towards a circular economy (CE) is increasingly influencing engineering practices and product development. However, the concept of circular product design remains difficult to grasp, with existing circular design criteria lacking specificity and measurability. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework to translate these vague criteria into measurable requirements for product development to assess and improve a product's suitability for a CE. The presented methodology involves a three-step approach: collecting and analyzing standards-derived requirements, assessing a product's suitability for various R-Strategies based on the requirements, and identifying improvement opportunities via action portfolios. An industrial use case involving a centrifuge for liquid separation and discussion of results within an industry consortium through a SWOT analysis validated the applicability of the framework. Within this research, a structured list of measurable requirements for a circular product design was derived from circular design criteria from standards in the field of CE. Based on this list of requirements, an assessment of a product's suitability for the four circular strategies reuse, repair, remanufacture and recycle was examined with repair showing the highest suitability. An action portfolio was developed from the assessment results, outlining possibilities for action to improve product design at identified weak spots. However, the practical implementation of these improvements and reassessment of the product are beyond the scope of this study. The developed framework has been reported to be comprehensive and easy-to-implement. The integration of a scale-based assessment approach achieved measurability of the requirements and ease of application. The transparent assessment process allowed product developers to trace the impact of individual requirement changes and to adjust the overall assessment by weighting requirements against each other. Although some subjectivity remained due to the scale-based assessment approach, documented guiding questions helped ensure consistency across various iterations of assessment. While further quantification could enhance precision, this research contributes to advancing the transition to a CE in industrial practice by better aligning product design with CE standards and principles.
Authors 6
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering, Campus-Boulevard 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Institute für Machine Elements and Systems Engineering, Schinkelstraße 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering, Campus-Boulevard 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering, Campus-Boulevard 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering, Campus-Boulevard 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
RWTH Aachen University, Institute für Machine Elements and Systems Engineering, Schinkelstraße 10, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Cited by 7 stored of 7
7 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).
References 45
-
W4281758930details pending0citations
-
W2062457789details pending0citations
-
W1974717757details pending0citations
-
W2062407456details pending0citations
-
W2082990416details pending0citations
-
W2144391317details pending0citations