Label‐Free Microscale Technologies for Isolation of Heterogeneous Circulating Tumor Cells

Advanced NanoBiomed Research, vol. 5

Abstract

The dissemination of primary solid tumor cells to distant organs, termed metastasis, is a major cause of cancer‐related deaths. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which can exist as individual cells or multicellular clusters, travel through the bloodstream. Their isolation from liquid biopsy samples is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment guidance for cancer patients. Current isolation methods typically rely on biomarkers like epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and utilize technologies such as magnetic beads or microfluidic chips. However, these methods face limitations due to tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, tumor cells that transfer into CTCs often undergo epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition, gaining invasive characteristics while losing epithelial markers. As a result, these cells are difficult to detect using EpCAM‐based methods. Label‐free microscale isolation technologies tackle the limitations of biomarker‐based methods by leveraging the distinctive physical properties of CTCs, such as their size, electrical charge, viscoelasticity, and deformability that contrast them from normal blood cells. This review evaluates primary label‐free isolation methods, including deterministic lateral displacement, microfiltration, acoustophoresis, and dielectrophoresis, and whether they can offer a deeper insight into tumor heterogeneity and the dynamics of cancer progression and treatment. Additionally, it highlights automated platforms for high‐throughput CTC isolation and analysis.

Authors 6

1. Gürhan Özkayar

   Delft University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft 2629 HZ the Netherlands

2. Esma Derin

   Delft University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft 2629 HZ the Netherlands

3. Georg R. Pesch

   University College Dublin

   Affiliation as printed

   School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering University College Dublin Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8 Ireland

4. John W.M. Martens

   Erasmus MC

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Medical Oncology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam 3015 GD the Netherlands

5. Peter ten Dijke Aachen

   Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · Oncode Institute

   Affiliation as printed

   Oncode Institute Department of Cell Biology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden 2333 ZC the Netherlands

6. Pouyan E. Boukany corresponding

   Delft University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Chemical Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft 2629 HZ the Netherlands