A

Moderators of nocebo effects in controlled experiments: A multi-level meta-analysis

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 172, pp. 106042

Abstract

Nocebo effects are a heterogenous phenomenon in which contextual cues trigger or exacerbate symptoms independently of active interventions. Suggestion, conditioning, and social observation are widely recognised as hallmark methods for inducing nocebo effects, but the extent to which nocebo effects are differentially influenced by suggestion type (e.g., direct or indirect suggestion) and mode of administration (e.g., verbal, textual, visual, etc.) across symptom domains remains unknown. We conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number CRD42023402097) to quantitatively synthesize available research on the factors that moderate effects in controlled nocebo experiments. Of 8469 search results, 105 experiments comprising 5017 participants and 391 effect sizes were analyzed. A multi-level meta-analysis revealed an overall moderate effect size for nocebo effects, g=0.50, [0.39, 0.62]. The magnitude of symptom expectancy effects was a significant moderator of nocebo effects. Verbal suggestion and social observation yielded moderate and comparable nocebo effects whereas technological devices, sham stimulation, and conditioning were independently associated with the induction of large nocebo effects. Greater specificity in the reporting of nocebo induction methods is required to elucidate the efficacy of different types of suggestions in inducing nocebo effects.

Authors 7

  1. Madeline V. Stein corresponding

    King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: madeline.stein@kcl.ac.uk

    Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK

  2. UCL School of Pharmacy · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK

  3. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

  4. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK

  5. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK

  6. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK

  7. King's College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK

Cited by 6 stored of 6

6 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 59