Criteria for Bibliographic Databases in a Well-Functioning Scholarly Communication and Research Assessment Ecosystem

Abstract

There is much to celebrate when it comes to recent developments in scholarly communication and research assessment. The scholarly communication landscape shows many promising initiatives, including a growing use of preprint services, open access repositories, and open peer review platforms, as well as an increasing interest in more equitable scholarly publishing models such as diamond open access and Subscribe to Open.

Authors 13

1. Virginia M. Barbour
   Affiliation as printed

   Medical Journal of Australia, Editorial

2. Caitlin Carter

   Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

   Affiliation as printed

   Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

3. Jonathon Alexis Coates

   ASAPbio

   Affiliation as printed

   ASAPbio

4. Kelly Denise Cobey

   Ottawa Heart Institute

   Affiliation as printed

   Ottawa Heart Institute

5. Katherine S. Corker

   ASAPbio

   Affiliation as printed

   ASAPbio

6. Elizabeth A Gadd
7. Bianca M. R. Kramer
   Affiliation as printed

   Sesame Open Science

8. Rebecca N Lawrence

   Faculty of 1000 (United States)

   Affiliation as printed

   F1000

9. Eva Méndez

   Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

   Affiliation as printed

   Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

10. Cameron Neylon

    Curtin University

    Affiliation as printed

    Curtin University

11. Janne Pölönen

    Federation of Finnish Learned Societies

    Affiliation as printed

    Federation of Finnish Learned Societies, Publication Forum

    Federation of Finnish Learned Societies

12. Bodo M. Stern

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute

13. Ludo Waltman Aachen

    Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University