A

Efficient Qubit Calibration by Binary-Search Hamiltonian Tracking

PRX Quantum, vol. 6

Abstract

We present and experimentally implement a real-time protocol for calibrating the frequency of a resonantly driven qubit, achieving exponential scaling in calibration precision with the number of measurements, up to the limit imposed by decoherence. The real-time processing capabilities of a classical controller dynamically generate adaptive probing sequences for qubit-frequency estimation. Each probing evolution time and drive frequency are calculated to divide the prior probability distribution into two branches, following a locally optimal strategy that mimics a conventional binary search. The scheme does not require repeated measurements at the same setting, as it accounts for state preparation and measurement errors. Its use of a parametrized probability distribution favors numerical accuracy and computational speed. We show the efficacy of the algorithm by stabilizing a flux-tunable transmon qubit, leading to improved coherence and gate fidelity. As benchmarked by gate-set tomography, the field-programmable gate array (FPGA) powered control electronics partially mitigates non-Markovian noise, which is detrimental to quantum error correction. The mitigation is achieved by dynamically updating and feeding forward the qubit frequency. Our protocol highlights the importance of feedback in improving the calibration and stability of qubits subject to drift and can be readily applied to other qubit platforms.

Authors 17

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Niels Bohr Institute

  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  4. ETH Zurich · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    ETH Zürich

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  5. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Universiteit Leiden

  6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  8. MIT Lincoln Laboratory · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  9. MIT Lincoln Laboratory · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  10. MIT Lincoln Laboratory · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  11. MIT Lincoln Laboratory · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  12. MIT Lincoln Laboratory · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  13. QuTech · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Delft University of Technology

    Niels Bohr Institute

    QuTech

  14. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  15. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  16. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  17. University of Regensburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Niels Bohr Institute

    QDevil, Quantum Machines

    University of Regensburg

Cited by 3 stored of 3

3 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 47