Author Correction: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app
Behavior Research Methods, vol. 57, pp. 53
Abstract
The original online version of this article was revised: The following sentences from page 1396 were updated as indicated. The model contains 25 freely estimated parameters. Was updated to: 35 freely estimated parameters. Therefore, this model has 120 − 25 = 95 df. Was updated to: 120 - 35 = 85 df. The resulting power to reject not-close fit equals 0.854. Was updated to: 0.816 The app indicates that for a power of 0.80, we would need a sample size of 183. Was updated to: 195. The figure in Example 4 has been corrected to show the changes made by the updates. (Figure presented.)
Authors 5
-
Suzanne Jak corresponding
Affiliation as printed
Methods and Statistics, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018, WS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. S.Jak@uva.nl
Methods and Statistics, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018, WS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Methods and Statistics, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018, WS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Methods and Statistics, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018, WS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Educational Sciences, Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Cited by 0 stored of 0
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).