Virtual reality-based retrospective think aloud (VR-RTA): a novel method for studying offender decision-making

Crime Science, vol. 13

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This article describes and tests a novel multi-method approach to examine decision-making: Virtual Reality-Based Retrospective Think-Aloud (VR-RTA). The VR-RTA method taps into the offender perspective and aims to enhance memory recall and information elicitation. Methods We applied VR-RTA among a sample of incarcerated burglars (N = 200) who scouted virtual neighborhoods to explore opportunities for burglary in immersive VR equipped with integrated eye tracking. Subsequently, they viewed a screen recording of their scouting process and simultaneously “thought aloud” about their assessment of the environment and decision-making strategies. Emerging themes were then further examined in an interview and linked to survey data. Recorded eye tracking data were used to examine burglars’ attention towards environmental features to identify deterrent and attracting cues, and were triangulated with the survey and interview data. Results Rich and detailed insights into participants’ interpretation of the environment and their decision-making strategies were obtained. VR-RTA assisted in verbalizing automated cognitive processes and increased participant engagement by building rapport. Conclusions As a multi-method approach able to capture in-the-moment considerations underlying decision-making during crime commission, VR-RTA offers potential to develop into an important tool for crime research. It is able to both overcome limitations of studies using retrospective methods, such as interviews and surveys, and contribute to the nascent field of criminological research using immersive technologies.

Authors 5

1. Carmen-Silva Sergiou Aachen Institute of Education and Child Studies

   Leiden University · Amsterdam University Medical Centers

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

   Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

2. Dominik Gerstner

   Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Criminology, Max Planck Institute for Crime, Security and Law, Günterstalstraße 73, 79100, Freiburg, Germany

3. Claire Nee

   University of Portsmouth

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

4. Henk Elffers

   Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement

   Affiliation as printed

   Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Jean‐Louis van Gelder corresponding Aachen Institute of Education and Child Studies

   Leiden University · Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law

   Affiliation as printed

   Department of Criminology, Max Planck Institute for Crime, Security and Law, Günterstalstraße 73, 79100, Freiburg, Germany

   Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands