A

Shared decision-making supported by outcome information regarding surveillance after curative treatment for breast cancer: Results of the SHOUT-BC study

European Journal of Cancer, vol. 213, pp. 115107

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Integrating outcome information into the process of shared decision-making (SDM) about post-treatment surveillance can enhance its effectiveness. The Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid (BCS-PtDA) integrates risk estimations of patients' risks for recurrences as well as outcome information on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). The SHOUT-BC study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the BCS-PtDA. Patients' satisfaction with the BCS-PtDA was also evaluated. METHODS: As described in a previously published protocol paper, the study employed a Prospective multiple interrupted time series (ITS) design in which the BCS-PtDA was implemented stepwise into the care pathways of eight Dutch hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 507 participants completed a questionnaire after their first surveillance consultation which usually takes place approximately one year after surgery. ITS analysis per hospital and subsequent meta-analysis over hospital effects indicated a significant increase in patient-reported SDM from pre- to post-implementation (overall estimated effect: 27.14, 95 % CI: 22.71 to 31.87, p < .0001). Moreover, post-implementation participants (n = 225) reported a more active role in decision-making, decreased decisional conflict, and increased knowledge on the aim and methods of surveillance. Furthermore, a decrease in FCR was seen post-implementation. The self-reported intensity of surveillance schedules decreased slightly and the BCS-PtDA received highly positive evaluations. DISCUSSION: The implementation of the BCS-PtDA, which integrates outcome information, led to increased patient-reported SDM and an improved quality of decision-making. The BCS-PtDA was evaluated highly positively by participants. Further research should address optimisation of the implementation.

Authors 11

  1. Jet Wies Ankersmid corresponding

    Santeon (Netherlands) · University of Twente

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands; Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.w.ankersmid@utwente.nl

  2. University of Twente

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Twente, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Enschede, the Netherlands

  3. Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

  4. Santeon (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  5. Noel Engels Aachen

    Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · Maasstad Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Maasstad Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden, the Netherlands

  6. OLVG · Santeon (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands; OLVG, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  7. Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Science Department IQ Health, Section Biostatistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

  8. Catharina Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Catharina Hospital, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

  9. ZorgKeuzeLab

    Affiliation as printed

    ZorgKeuzeLab, Delft, the Netherlands

  10. Santeon (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  11. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · University of Twente

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Twente, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, Enschede, the Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Department of Research and Development, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Cited by 5 stored of 5

5 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 29