Guidelines for reporting research using systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe)
Quality & Quantity, vol. 59, pp. 587–603
Abstract
Abstract Systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe) is used across disciplines and topics but methodological reporting is often incomplete. We developed internationally generated, interdisciplinary guidelines for methodological reporting of such research. Using Delphi methodology, a working group of 22 experts sought group consensus in three rounds. Participants first assessed an initial set of reporting criteria (round 1). Next, in interactive meetings participants revised these criteria and reached consensus on reporting content (rounds 2 & 3). We present 20 criteria constituting the first comprehensive reporting guidelines for SCOBe research using existing, newly developed, or modified coding systems. The criteria encompass three procedural domains: 1. Research context; 2. Properties of the coding scheme; and 3. Application of the coding scheme. The presented guidelines will assist in substantiating and assessing the quality of SCOBe research. We encourage researchers to adopt these guidelines, to enhance quality of mono- and interdisciplinary research.
Authors 19
-
Marij A. Hillen corresponding
Amsterdam Public Health · Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Affiliation as printed
Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
-
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement
Affiliation as printed
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
-
Affiliation as printed
School of Business and Economics, KIN Center for Digital Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
-
University of the Witwatersrand
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Youth and Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Youth and Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
-
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement
Affiliation as printed
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Youth and Family, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Psychology Department, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, UK
-
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
-
Affiliation as printed
School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
-
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
Affiliation as printed
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Almere, the Netherlands
-
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
Affiliation as printed
Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
Cited by 19 stored of 19
19 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).