A

85: A Virtual Reality Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator Simulator Versus Conventional Perfusion Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ASAIO Journal, vol. 70, pp. 107

Abstract

Introduction: This randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality (VR) Extracorporeal Circulation Membrane Oxygenator (ECMO) simulator versus conventional video training in teaching ICU nurses how to perform an ECMO circuit check. Materials & Methods: Participants (n=35) were cardiothoracic and ICU nurses with no prior ECMO experience and were randomized to either video training or VR-ECMO simulator (sim) training. The video training replicated a standard ECMO circuit check lesson, while the VR-ECMO sim covered the same material and steps. After training, participants performed a circuit check on a physical test circuit with a real ECMO machine, which was scored for accuracy and time. The control group also had the opportunity to try the VR-ECMO sim, and all VR participants completed a Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire. Results: Results showed that the VR group made significantly fewer mistakes (1.1 per test) compared to the control group (2.1 per test, p=0.006). Although the VR group’s mean completion time (212 seconds) was shorter than the control group’s (237 seconds), this difference was not significant. The USE questionnaire revealed that 97% of participants felt they learned a lot from the VR-ECMO sim, 97% enjoyed the simulation, and 97% were satisfied with its quality. Additionally, 100% found it realistic. Conclusion: In conclusion, the VR-ECMO sim provided superior training for ECMO circuit checks compared to conventional training, resulting in significantly fewer mistakes. Participants found the VR training highly useful, realistic, and enjoyable.

Authors 7

  1. Samuel A Max Aachen

    Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  2. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  3. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  4. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  5. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  6. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

  7. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0