Photon-Counting Versus Dual-Source CT for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Planning
Academic Radiology, vol. 31, pp. 4780–4789
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular CT is required for planning transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). PURPOSE: To compare image quality, suitability for TAVI planning, and radiation dose of photon-counting CT (PCCT) with that of dual-source CT (DSCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study on consecutive TAVI candidates with aortic valve stenosis who underwent contrast-enhanced aorto-ilio-femoral PCCT and/or DSCT between 01/2022 and 07/2023. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated by standardized ROI analysis. Image quality and suitability for TAVI planning were assessed by four independent expert readers (two cardiac radiologists, two cardiologists) on a 5-point-scale. CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length-product (DLP) were used to calculate effective radiation dose (eRD). RESULTS: 300 patients (136 female, median age: 81 years, IQR: 76-84) underwent 302 CT examinations, with PCCT in 202, DSCT in 100; two patients underwent both. Although SNR and CNR were significantly lower in PCCT vs. DSCT images (33.0 ± 10.5 vs. 47.3 ± 16.4 and 47.3 ± 14.8 vs. 59.3 ± 21.9, P < .001, respectively), visual image quality was higher in PCCT vs. DSCT (4.8 vs. 3.3, P < .001), with moderate overall interreader agreement among radiologists and among cardiologists (κ = 0.60, respectively). Image quality was rated as "excellent" in 160/202 (79.2%) of PCCT vs. 5/100 (5%) of DSCT cases. Readers found images suitable to depict the aortic valve hinge points and to map the femoral access path in 99% of PCCT vs. 85% of DSCT (P < 0.01), with suitability ranked significantly higher in PCCT vs. DSCT (4.8 vs. 3.3, P < .001). Mean CTDI and DLP, and thus eRD, were significantly lower for PCCT vs. DSCT (22.4 vs. 62.9; 519.4 vs. 895.5, and 8.8 ± 4.5 mSv vs. 15.3 ± 5.8 mSv; all P < .001). CONCLUSION: PCCT improves image quality, effectively avoids non-diagnostic CT imaging for TAVI planning, and is associated with a lower radiation dose compared to state-of-the-art DSCT. Radiologists and cardiologists found PCCT images more suitable for TAVI planning.
Authors 8
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany. Electronic address: tdirrichs@ukaachen.de
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
-
Siemens Healthineers (Germany)
Affiliation as printed
Siemens Healthcare, Computed Tomography Division, Forchheim, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen 52074, Germany
Cited by 13 stored of 13
13 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).