A

Donor KIR genotype based outcome prediction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: no land in sight

Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 15, pp. 1350470

Abstract

Optimizing natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity could further improve outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The donor’s Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) genotype may provide important information in this regard. In the past decade, different models have been proposed aiming at maximizing NK cell activation by activating KIR-ligand interactions or minimizing inhibitory KIR-ligand interactions. Alternative classifications intended predicting outcome after alloHCT by donor KIR-haplotypes. In the present study, we aimed at validating proposed models and exploring more classification approaches. To this end, we analyzed samples stored at the Collaborative Biobank from HLA-compatible unrelated stem cell donors who had donated for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) and whose outcome data had been reported to EBMT or CIBMTR. The donor KIR genotype was determined by high resolution amplicon-based next generation sequencing. We analyzed data from 5,017 transplants. The median patient age at alloHCT was 56 years. Patients were transplanted for AML between 2013 and 2018. Donor-recipient pairs were matched for HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 (79%) or had single HLA mismatches. Myeloablative conditioning was given to 56% of patients. Fifty-two percent of patients received anti-thymocyte-globulin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, 32% calcineurin-inhibitor-based prophylaxis, and 7% post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis. We tested several previously reported classifications in multivariable regression analyses but could not confirm outcome associations. Exploratory analyses in 1,939 patients (39%) who were transplanted from donors with homozygous centromeric (cen) or telomeric (tel) A or B motifs, showed that the donor cen B/B -tel A/A diplotype was associated with a trend to better event-free survival (HR 0.84, p=.08) and reduced risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 0.65, p=.01). When we further dissected the contribution of B subtypes, we found that only the cen B01/B01 - telA/A diplotype was associated with a reduced risk of relapse (HR 0.40, p=.04) while all subtype combinations contributed to a reduced risk of NRM. This exploratory finding has to be validated in an independent data set. In summary, the existing body of evidence is not (yet) consistent enough to recommend use of donor KIR genotype information for donor selection in routine clinical practice.

Authors 29

  1. Johannes Schetelig corresponding

    Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei · Technische Universität Dresden

    Affiliation as printed

    Clinical Trials Unit, DKMS Group, Dresden, Germany

    Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

  2. Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei

    Affiliation as printed

    Clinical Trials Unit, DKMS Group, Dresden, Germany

  3. Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei · Technische Universität Dresden

    Affiliation as printed

    Clinical Trials Unit, DKMS Group, Dresden, Germany

    Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

  4. European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Affiliation as printed

    EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands

  5. National Marrow Donor Program

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, United States

  6. Affiliation as printed

    RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, St. Petersburg, Russia

  7. Essen University Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Klinik für Hämatologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany

  8. Copenhagen University Hospital · Rigshospitalet

    Affiliation as printed

    Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

  9. Heidelberg University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

  10. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux

    Affiliation as printed

    Service Hématologie clinique de Thérapie cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaus, Bordeaux, France

  11. Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion

    Affiliation as printed

    Transplant Unit and Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Hematology and Bood Transfusion, Prague, Czechia

  12. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Cellular Immunotherapy and Stem Cell Transplantation, Third Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, University Cancer Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  13. University Medical Center Groningen · University of Groningen

    Affiliation as printed

    University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

  14. Heartlands Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Haematology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

  15. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Hematology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

  16. Institutul Clinic Fundeni

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania

  17. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

  18. Affiliation as printed

    DKMS Life Science Lab, Dresden, Germany

  19. Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei

    Affiliation as printed

    DKMS Group, Tübingen, Germany

    DKMS Life Science Lab, Dresden, Germany

  20. Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei

    Affiliation as printed

    DKMS Group, Tübingen, Germany

  21. NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · Weill Cornell Medicine

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States

  22. National Marrow Donor Program

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, United States

  23. National Marrow Donor Program

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN, United States

  24. Anthony Nolan · The Royal Free Hospital · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Anthony Nolan Research Institute, Royal Free Hospital, London & Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom

  25. National Cancer Institute · Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

    Affiliation as printed

    National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Bethesda, MD, United States

  26. Medical University of South Carolina

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States

  27. IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

    Affiliation as printed

    Haematology and BMT, Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l., Milan, Italy

  28. Institut Paoli-Calmettes

    Affiliation as printed

    Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Marseille, France

  29. Essen University Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Experimental Cellular Therapy, University Hospital, Essen, Germany

Cited by 14 stored of 14

14 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 42