A

PROACTING: predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer from routine diagnostic histopathology biopsies with deep learning

Breast Cancer Research, vol. 25, pp. 142

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive breast cancer patients are increasingly being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, only a fraction of the patients respond to it completely. To prevent overtreatment, there is an urgent need for biomarkers to predict treatment response before administering the therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we developed hypothesis-driven interpretable biomarkers based on deep learning, to predict the pathological complete response (pCR, i.e., the absence of tumor cells in the surgical resection specimens) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy solely using digital pathology H&E images of pre-treatment breast biopsies. Our approach consists of two steps: First, we use deep learning to characterize aspects of the tumor micro-environment by detecting mitoses and segmenting tissue into several morphology compartments including tumor, lymphocytes and stroma. Second, we derive computational biomarkers from the segmentation and detection output to encode slide-level relationships of components of the tumor microenvironment, such as tumor and mitoses, stroma, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). RESULTS: We developed and evaluated our method on slides from n = 721 patients from three European medical centers with triple-negative and Luminal B breast cancers and performed external independent validation on n = 126 patients from a public dataset. We report the predictive value of the investigated biomarkers for predicting pCR with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.66 and 0.88 across the tested cohorts. CONCLUSION: The proposed computational biomarkers predict pCR, but will require more evaluation and finetuning for clinical application. Our results further corroborate the potential role of deep learning to automate TILs quantification, and their predictive value in breast cancer neoadjuvant treatment planning, along with automated mitoses quantification. We made our method publicly available to extract segmentation-based biomarkers for research purposes.

Authors 16

  1. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  2. University of Brescia

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

  3. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  4. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  5. Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria

    Affiliation as printed

    Pathology Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy

  6. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  7. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  8. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  9. Radboud University Medical Center · Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Integrated Oncology (Institut du cancer de l'Ouest), Angers, France

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  10. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  11. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  12. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  13. Leiden University Medical Center · The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  14. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  15. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  16. Francesco Ciompi corresponding

    Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. francesco.ciompi@radboudumc.nl

    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Cited by 36 stored of 38

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 34