A

Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data

AGU Advances, vol. 4

Abstract

Abstract The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and Global Methane Pledge formalized agreement for countries to report and reduce methane emissions to mitigate near‐term climate change. Emission inventories generated through surface activity measurements are reported annually or bi‐annually, and evaluated periodically through a “Global Stocktake.” Emissions inverted from atmospheric data support evaluation of reported inventories, but their systematic use is stifled by spatially variable biases from prior errors combined with limited sensitivity of observations to emissions (also called smoothing error), as‐well‐as poorly characterized information content. Here, we demonstrate a Bayesian, optimal estimation (OE) algorithm for evaluating a state‐of‐the‐art inventory (EDGAR v6.0) using satellite‐based emissions from 2009 to 2018. The OE algorithm quantifies the information content (uncertainty reduction, sectoral attribution, spatial resolution) of the satellite‐based emissions and disentangles the effect of smoothing error when comparing to an inventory. We find robust differences between satellite and EDGAR for total livestock, rice, and coal emissions: 14 ± 9, 12 ± 8, −11 ± 6 Tg CH 4 /yr respectively. EDGAR and satellite agree that livestock emissions are increasing (0.25–1.3 Tg CH 4 /yr/yr), primarily in the Indo‐Pakistan region, sub‐tropical Africa, and the Southern Brazilian; East Asia rice emissions are also increasing, highlighting the importance of agriculture on the atmospheric methane growth rate. In contrast, low information content for the waste and fossil emission trends confounds comparison between EDGAR and satellite; increased sampling and spatial resolution of satellite observations are therefore needed to evaluate reported changes to emissions in these sectors.

Authors 13

  1. John R. Worden corresponding

    California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  2. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  3. Harvard University · Westlake University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

    Key Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province School of Engineering Westlake University Hangzhou China

    Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Key Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China

  4. University of Arizona

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA

    University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

  5. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

    Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  6. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  7. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  8. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Leiden The Netherlands

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

  9. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  10. University of Arizona

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA

    University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

  11. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute for Technology Pasadena CA USA

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute for Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  12. Rocky Mountain Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Rocky Mountain Institute Boulder CO USA

    Rocky Mountain Institute, Boulder, CO, USA

  13. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

    Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

Cited by 21 stored of 21

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 56