A

Perspectives on scientific error

Royal Society Open Science, vol. 10, pp. 230448

Abstract

Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published findings do not replicate and are likely false. The current position paper provides a broad perspective on scientific error, which may lead to replication failures. This broad perspective focuses on reform history and on opportunities for future reform. We organize our perspective along four main themes: institutional reform, methodological reform, statistical reform and publishing reform. For each theme, we illustrate potential errors by narrating the story of a fictional researcher during the research cycle. We discuss future opportunities for reform. The resulting agenda provides a resource to usher in an era that is marked by a research culture that is less error-prone and a scientific publication landscape with fewer spurious findings.

Authors 15

  1. Don van Ravenzwaaij corresponding

    University of Groningen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Heymans Building, room 239, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands

  2. Tilburg University

    Affiliation as printed

    Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands

  3. The University of Western Australia · London School of Economics and Political Science

    Affiliation as printed

    London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK

    University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia

  4. University of Groningen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Heymans Building, room 239, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands

  5. University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  6. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK

  7. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands

  8. University of Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Zurich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland

  9. University of Bristol

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK

  10. University of Groningen · Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Heymans Building, room 239, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands

    QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, 10178 Berlin, Germany

  11. Affiliation as printed

    IG&H Consulting, 3528 AC Utrecht, The Netherlands

  12. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands

  13. Tilburg University · Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Affiliation as printed

    QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin, 10178 Berlin, Germany

    Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands

  14. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands

  15. University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Cited by 16 stored of 16

16 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 96