A

Comment on acp-2022-749

Abstract

Abstract. We quantify weekly methane emissions at 0.25°×0.3125° (≈25×25 km2) resolution from the Permian Basin, the largest oil production basin in the United States, by inverse analysis of satellite observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) from May 2018 to October 2020. The mean oil and gas emission from the region (± standard deviation of weekly estimates) was 3.7 ± 0.9 Tg a-1, higher than previous TROPOMI inversion estimates that may have used too-low prior emissions or biased background assumptions. We find strong week-to-week variability in emissions superimposed on longer-term trends, and these are consistent with independent inferences of temporal emission variability from tower, aircraft, and multispectral satellite data. New well development and local natural gas spot price were significant drivers of variability in emissions over our study period, but the concurrent 50 % increase in oil and gas production was not. The methane intensity (methane emitted per unit of methane gas produced) averaged 4.6 % ± 1.3 % and steadily decreased over the period from 5–6 % in 2018 to 3–4 % in 2020. While the decreasing trend suggests improvement in operator practices during the study period, methane emissions from the Permian Basin remained high, with methane intensity an order of magnitude above recent industry targets of <0.2 %. Our success in using TROPOMI satellite observations for weekly estimates of emissions from a major oil production basin shows promise for application to near-real-time monitoring in support of climate change mitigation efforts.

Authors 21

  1. Daniel J. Varon corresponding

    Harvard University · GHGSat (Canada)

    Affiliation as printed

    GHGSat, Inc., Montréal, H2W 1Y5, Canada

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  2. Daniel J. Jacob corresponding

    Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  3. Benjamin Hmiel corresponding

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Affiliation as printed

    Environmental Defense Fund, Washington DC, United States

  4. Ritesh Gautam corresponding

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Affiliation as printed

    Environmental Defense Fund, Washington DC, United States

  5. David Richard Lyon corresponding

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Affiliation as printed

    Environmental Defense Fund, Washington DC, United States

  6. Mark Omara corresponding

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Affiliation as printed

    Environmental Defense Fund, Washington DC, United States

  7. Melissa Payer Sulprizio corresponding

    Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  8. Lu Hua Shen corresponding

    Peking University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China

  9. Drew C. Pendergrass corresponding

    Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  10. Hannah O. Nesser corresponding

    Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  11. Zhen Qu corresponding

    Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

  12. Zachary Robert Barkley corresponding

    Pennsylvania State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

  13. Natasha Lynn Miles corresponding

    Pennsylvania State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

  14. Scott James Richardson corresponding

    Pennsylvania State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

  15. Kenneth James Davis corresponding

    Pennsylvania State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

    Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States

  16. Sudhanshu Pandey corresponding

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States

  17. Xiao Hui Lu corresponding

    Sun Yat-sen University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

  18. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

  19. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

  20. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

  21. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 16

16 results