A

Sentinel Node Procedure to Select Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Occult Nodal Metastases for Whole Pelvis Radiotherapy

European Urology Open Science, vol. 49, pp. 80–89

Abstract

Accurate identification of men who harbor nodal metastases is necessary to select patients who most likely benefit from whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT). Limited sensitivity of diagnostic imaging approaches for the detection of nodal micrometastases has led to the exploration of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). To evaluate whether SLNB can be used as a tool to select pathologically node-positive patients who likely benefit from WPRT. We included 528 clinically node-negative primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients with an estimated nodal risk of >5% treated between 2007 and 2018. A total of 267 patients were directly treated with prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT; non-SLNB group), while 261 patients underwent SLNB to remove lymph nodes directly draining from the primary tumor prior to radiotherapy (SLNB group); pN0 patients were treated with PORT, while pN1 patients were offered WPRT. Biochemical recurrence–free survival (BCRFS) and radiological recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were compared using propensity score weighted (PSW) Cox proportional hazard models. The median follow-up was 71 mo. Occult nodal metastases were found in 97 (37%) SLNB patients (median metastasis size: 2 mm). Adjusted 7-yr BCRFS rates were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77–86%) in the SLNB group and 49% (95% CI 43–56%) in the non-SLNB group. The corresponding adjusted 7-yr RRFS rates were 83% (95% CI 78–87%) and 52% (95% CI 46–59%), respectively. In the PSW multivariable Cox regression analysis, SLNB was associated with improved BCRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.59, p < 0.001) and RRFS (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28–0.69, p < 0.001). Limitations include the bias inherent to the study’s retrospective nature. SLNB-based selection of pN1 PCa patients for WPRT was associated with significantly improved BCRFS and RRFS compared with (conventional) imaging-based PORT. Sentinel node biopsy can be used to select patients who will benefit from the addition of pelvis radiotherapy. This strategy results in a longer duration of prostate-specific antigen control and a lower risk of radiological recurrence.

Authors 11

  1. Hilda A. de Barros corresponding

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  2. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  3. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  4. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  5. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  6. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  7. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  8. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  9. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  10. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  11. The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Cited by 16 stored of 16

16 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 30