A

Stressor-Specific Sex Differences in Amygdala–Frontal Cortex Networks

Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 865

Abstract

Females and males differ in stress reactivity, coping, and the prevalence rates of stress-related disorders. According to a neurocognitive framework of stress coping, the functional connectivity between the amygdala and frontal regions (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)) plays a key role in how people deal with stress. In the current study, we investigated the effects of sex and stressor type in a within-subject counterbalanced design on the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the amygdala and these frontal regions in 77 healthy participants (40 females). Both stressor types led to changes in subjective ratings, with decreasing positive affect and increasing negative affect and anger. Females showed higher amygdala-vACC and amygdala-mPFC rsFC for social exclusion than for achievement stress, and compared to males. Whereas a higher amygdala-vACC rsFC indicates the activation of emotion processing and coping, a higher amygdala-mPFC rsFC indicates feelings of reward and social gain, highlighting the positive effects of social affiliation. Thus, for females, feeling socially affiliated might be more fundamental than for males. Our data indicate interactions of sex and stressor in amygdala-frontal coupling, which translationally contributes to a better understanding of the sex differences in prevalence rates and stress coping.

Authors 9

  1. Zoé Bürger corresponding

    University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Centre for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

  2. Forschungszentrum Jülich · Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-7, Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany

    Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

  3. Forschungszentrum Jülich · Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-7, Research Centre Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany

    Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

  4. Jülich Aachen Research Alliance · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

    JARA BRAIN Institute I, Translational Brain Medicine, 52428 Jülich, Germany

  5. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    Neuropsychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

  6. Medical University of Vienna

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

    High-Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

  7. Medical University of Vienna

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

    High-Field MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

  8. University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Centre for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

    LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany

  9. Lydia Kogler corresponding

    University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Centre for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Cited by 26 stored of 26

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 63