Securitizing mobility: Profiling ‘non-core’ Europeans

Security Dialogue, vol. 54, pp. 620–638

Abstract

Abstract By combining securitization literature and literature from the field of border criminologies, this article reflects upon the ongoing securitization of intra-EU East–West mobility. The European Union is built on the inherent tension between the (economic) benefits and risks of one of its core principles: the principle of free movement. The two enlargements of the EU that led to the inclusion of several countries located in Central and Eastern Europe further increased this tension and led countries in Western Europe to officially reconstruct intra-Schengen borders. By looking into recent practices of (border) policing in the Netherlands, this article illustrates how CEE nationals are subjected not only to a securitized discourse around their mobility but also to securitized policing practices that aim to create a division between ‘core’ and ‘non-core’ Europeans while at the same time distinguishing between possible ‘crimmigrant’ others and bona fide travellers.

Authors 1

1. Maartje van der Woude corresponding Aachen

   Leiden University

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University, the  

   Leiden University, Steenschuur 25, Leiden, 2311 ES, the Netherlands

   Leiden University, the Netherlands