A

How virtual agents can learn to synchronize: An adaptive joint decision-making model of psychotherapy

Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 79, pp. 138–155

Abstract

Joint decision-making can be seen as the synchronization of actions and emotions, usually via nonverbal interaction between people while they show empathy. The aim of the current paper was (1) to develop an adaptive computational model for the type of synchrony that can occur in joint decision-making for two persons modeled as agents, and (2) to visualize the two persons by avatars as virtual agents during their decision-making. How to model joint decision-making computationally while taking into account adaptivity is rarely addressed, although such models based on psychological literature have a lot of future applications like online coaching and therapeutics. We used an adaptive network-oriented modelling approach to build an adaptive joint decision-making model in an agent-based manner and simulated multiple scenarios of such joint decision-making processes using a dedicated software environment that was implemented in MATLAB. Programming in the Unity 3D engine was done to virtualize this process as nonverbal interaction between virtual agents, their internal and external states, and the scenario. Although our adaptive joint decision model has general application areas, we have selected a therapeutic session as example scenario to visualize and interpret the example simulations.

Authors 6

  1. Leiden University · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Methodology and Statistics Research Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  3. Jan Treur corresponding

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Social AI Group, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · KU Leuven

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Methodology and Statistics Research Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  5. New York University · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    NYU – Max Planck Center for Language, Music and Emotion, New York University, United States

  6. Sander Leon Koole corresponding

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Emotion Regulation Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Cited by 34 stored of 35

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 53