A

Five years’ experience with value-based quality improvement teams: the key factors to a successful implementation in hospital care

BMC Health Services Research, vol. 22, pp. 1271

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, value-based healthcare (VBHC) has become one of the most accepted concepts for fixing the 'broken' healthcare systems. Numerous hospitals have embraced VBHC and are trying to implement value-based quality improvement (VBQI) into their practice. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how to practically implement VBHC and organizations differ in their approach. The aim of this study was to explore the main factors that were experienced as hindering and/or supporting in the implementation of VBQI teams in hospital care. METHODS: A qualitative study was performed with semi-structured interviews with 43 members of eight VBQI teams in a large Dutch top-clinical teaching hospital. Participants included physicians, physician assistants, nurses, VBHC project leaders, managers, social workers, researchers and paramedics. Interview grids were structured according to the RE-AIM model (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance). A thematic content analysis with open coding was used to identify emerging (sub)themes. RESULTS: We identified nine main factors divided over three domains (organization, culture and practice) that determined whether the implementation of VBQI teams was successful or not: 1). Practical organization of value-based quality improvement teams, 2). Organizational structure 3). Integration of VBHC with existing quality improvement approaches and research 4). Adoption and knowledge of the VBHC concept in the hospital 5). Multidisciplinary engagement 6). Medical leadership 7). Goal setting and selecting quality improvement initiatives 8). Long-cycle benchmarking and short-cycle feedback 9). Availability of outcome data. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study goes beyond the general VBHC theory and provides healthcare providers with more detailed knowledge on how to practically implement value-based quality improvement in a hospital care setting. Factors in the 'organization' and 'practice' domain were mentioned in the strategic value agenda of Porter and Lee. Though, this study provides more practical insight in these two domains. Factors in the 'culture' domain were not mentioned in the strategic value agenda and have not yet been thoroughly researched before.

Authors 4

  1. Kirsten Daniels corresponding

    Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · Radboud Institute for Health Sciences

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, the Netherlands. k.daniels@antoniusziekenhuis.nl

    Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands. k.daniels@antoniusziekenhuis.nl

    Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, the Netherlands

  2. Maastricht University · St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, the Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  4. Radboud University Nijmegen · Radboud University Medical Center · St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · Radboud Institute for Health Sciences

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Value-Based Healthcare, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, the Netherlands

    Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Cited by 32 stored of 42

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 24