Comparative analysis of machine learning and multi-criteria decision making techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping of Muzaffarabad district
Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 10
Abstract
Landslides are natural disasters deliberated as the most destructive among the others considered. Using the Muzaffarabad as a case study, this work compares the performance of three conventional Machine Learning (ML) techniques, namely Logistic Regression (LGR), Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and two Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques, namely Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for the susceptibility mapping of landslides. Most of these techniques have been used in the region of Northern Pakistan before for the same purpose. However, this study for landslide susceptibility assessment compares the performance of various techniques and provides additional insights into the factors used by adopting multicollinearity analysis. Landslide-inducing factors considered in this research are lithology, slope, flow direction, fault lines, aspect, elevation, curvature, earthquakes, plan curvature, precipitation, profile curvature, Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), roads, and waterways. Results show that SVM performs better than LGR and LR among ML models. On the other hand, the performance of AHP was better than TOPSIS. All the models rank slope, precipitation, elevation, lithology, NDWI, and flow direction as the top three most imperative landslide-inducing factors. Results show 80% accuracy in Landslide Susceptibility Maps (LSMs) from ML techniques. The accuracy of the produced map from the AHP model is 80%, but for TOPSIS, it is less (78%). In disaster planning, the produced LSMs can significantly help the decision-makers, town planners, and local management take necessary measures to decrease the loss of life and assets.
Authors 6
-
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation · University of Twente
Affiliation as printed
ITC Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation , University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands,
ITC Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands,
-
Affiliation as printed
COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
-
Affiliation as printed
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems , Northern Arizona University , Flagstaff , AZ , United States,
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States,
-
Affiliation as printed
Division of Earth Sciences and Geography , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany,
Division of Earth Sciences and Geography, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany,
-
Wuhan University · State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing · Mississippi State University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture , Mississippi State University , Mississippi State , MS , United States,
State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing , Wuhan University , Wuhan , China,
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States,
State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China,
-
Shujing Qin corresponding
Wuhan University · State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science
Affiliation as printed
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Cited by 75 stored of 75
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).