A

Remotely‐sensed slowing down in spatially patterned dryland ecosystems

Ecography, vol. 2022

Abstract

Regular vegetation patterns have been predicted to indicate a system slowing down and possibly desertification of drylands. However, these predictions have not yet been observed in dryland vegetation due to the inherent logistic difficulty to gather longer‐term in situ data. Here, we evaluate the theoretical prediction that regular vegetation patterns are associated with empirically derived temporal indicators (autocorrelation, variance, responsiveness) of critical slowing down in a dryland ecosystem in Sudan using different remote sensing products. We use recently developed methods using remote‐sensing EVI time‐series in combination with classified regular vegetation patterns along a rainfall gradient in Sudan to test the predicted slowing down. We tested our empirical findings against theoretical predictions from a stochastic version of a spatial explicit model that has been used to describe vegetation dynamics in drylands under aridity stress. Overall, three temporal indicators (responsiveness, temporal autocorrelation, variance) show slowing down as vegetation patterns change from gaps to labyrinths to spots towards more arid conditions, confirming predictions. However, this transition exhibits non‐linearities, specifically when patterns change configuration. Model simulations reveal that the transition between patterns temporarily slows down the system affecting the temporal indicators. These transient states when vegetation patterns reorganize thus affect the systems resilience indicators in a non‐linear way. Our findings suggest that spatial self‐organization of dryland vegetation is associated with critical slowing down, but this transition towards reduced resilience happens in a non‐linear way. Future work should aim to better understand transient dynamics in regular vegetation patterns in dryland ecosystems, because long transients make regular vegetation patterns of limited use for management in anticipating critical transitions.

Authors 4

  1. Leiden University · University of Groningen · Princeton University

    Affiliation as printed

    Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ. Princeton NJ USA

    Groningen Inst. for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), Univ. of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands

    Inst. of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden Univ. Leiden the Netherlands

    Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, USA

    Groningen Inst. for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), Univ. of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    Inst. of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden Univ., Leiden, the Netherlands

  2. Princeton University · ICTP South American Institute for Fundamental Research · Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)

    Affiliation as printed

    Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ. Princeton NJ USA

    ICTP South American Inst. for Fundamental Research&Inst. de Fisica Teorica, Univ. Estadual Paulista – UNESP Sao Paulo SP Brazil

    Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, USA

  3. University of California, Los Angeles · International Institute of Tropical Agriculture

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Tropical Research, Inst. of the Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA

    International Inst. of Tropical Agriculture Yaoundé Cameroon

    Center for Tropical Research, Inst. of the Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · École Pratique des Hautes Études · Université de Montpellier · Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier · Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

    Affiliation as printed

    Inst. des Sciences de l'Evolution Montpellier, Univ. of Montpellier/CNRS/EPHE/IRD Montpellier France

    Inst. des Sciences de l'Evolution Montpellier, Univ. of Montpellier/CNRS/EPHE/IRD, Montpellier, France

Cited by 23 stored of 22

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 59