A

SN2 versus SN2′ Competition

The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 87, pp. 8892–8901

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S N 2 and S N 2′ pathways for X – + H 2 C═CHCH 2 Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at allylic systems, i.e., C γ ═C β –C α –Y, bearing a leaving-group at the α-position, proceed either via a direct attack at the α-carbon (S N 2) or via an attack at the γ-carbon, involving a concerted allylic rearrangement (S N 2′), in both cases leading to the expulsion of the leaving-group. Herein, we provide a physically sound model to rationalize under which circumstances a nucleophile will follow either the aliphatic S N 2 or allylic S N 2′ pathway. Our activation strain analyses expose the underlying physical factors that steer the S N 2/S N 2′ competition and, again, demonstrate that the concepts of a reaction’s “characteristic distortivity” and “transition state acidity” provide explanations and design tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends in organic synthesis.

Authors 4

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling (ACMM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  2. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling (ACMM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  3. Radboud University Nijmegen · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling (ACMM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Institute for Molecules and Materials (IMM), Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  4. Trevor A. Hamlin corresponding

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling (ACMM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Cited by 29 stored of 29

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 65