A

Comment on acp-2021-671

Abstract

Abstract. We quantify methane emissions and their 2010–2017 trends by sector in the contiguous United States (CONUS), Canada, and Mexico by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric methane observations. The inversion uses as a prior estimate the national anthropogenic emission inventories for the three countries reported by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), and the Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC) in Mexico to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and thus serves as an evaluation of these inventories in terms of their magnitudes and trends. Emissions are optimized with a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) at 0.5∘×0.625∘ resolution and for individual years. Optimization is done analytically using lognormal error forms. This yields closed-form statistics of error covariances and information content on the posterior (optimized) estimates, allows better representation of the high tail of the emission distribution, and enables construction of a large ensemble of inverse solutions using different observations and assumptions. We find that GOSAT and in situ observations are largely consistent and complementary in the optimization of methane emissions for North America. Mean 2010–2017 anthropogenic emissions from our base GOSAT + in situ inversion, with ranges from the inversion ensemble, are 36.9 (32.5–37.8) Tg a−1 for CONUS, 5.3 (3.6–5.7) Tg a−1 for Canada, and 6.0 (4.7–6.1) Tg a−1 for Mexico. These are higher than the most recent reported national inventories of 26.0 Tg a−1 for the US (EPA), 4.0 Tg a−1 for Canada (ECCC), and 5.0 Tg a−1 for Mexico (INECC). The correction in all three countries is largely driven by a factor of 2 underestimate in emissions from the oil sector with major contributions from the south-central US, western Canada, and southeastern Mexico. Total CONUS anthropogenic emissions in our inversion peak in 2014, in contrast to the EPA report of a steady decreasing trend over 2010–2017. This reflects offsetting effects of increasing emissions from the oil and landfill sectors, decreasing emissions from the gas sector, and flat emissions from the livestock and coal sectors. We find decreasing trends in Canadian and Mexican anthropogenic methane emissions over the 2010–2017 period, mainly driven by oil and gas emissions. Our best estimates of mean 2010–2017 wetland emissions are 8.4 (6.4–10.6) Tg a−1 for CONUS, 9.9 (7.8–12.0) Tg a−1 for Canada, and 0.6 (0.4–0.6) Tg a−1 for Mexico. Wetland emissions in CONUS show an increasing trend of +2.6 (+1.7 to +3.8)% a−1 over 2010–2017 correlated with precipitation.

Authors 22

  1. Harvard University · Sun Yat-sen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Guangdong Provincial Observation and Research Station for Climate Environment and Air Quality Change in the Pearl River Estuary, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China

  2. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  3. Sun Yat-sen University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China

  4. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  5. Harvard University · Westlake University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Institute of Advanced Technology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

    School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

  6. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  7. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  8. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  9. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  10. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

  11. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  12. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  13. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

  14. Sun Yat-sen University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China

  15. University of Leicester · National Centre for Earth Observation

    Affiliation as printed

    Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  16. University of Leicester · National Centre for Earth Observation

    Affiliation as printed

    Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  17. Environmental Defense Fund

    Affiliation as printed

    Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC, USA

  18. Brown University

    Affiliation as printed

    RMI, New York, NY, USA

    Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

  19. Environment and Climate Change Canada

    Affiliation as printed

    Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada

  20. Rocky Mountain Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    RMI, Boulder, CO, USA

  21. Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático

    Affiliation as printed

    Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC), Mexico City, Mexico

  22. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 61