A

Constraining the Twomey effect from satellite observations: Issues and perspectives

Abstract

Abstract. The Twomey effect describes the radiative forcing associated with a change in cloud albedo due to an increase in anthropogenic aerosol emissions. It is driven by the perturbation in cloud droplet number concentration (ΔNd,ant) in liquid-water clouds and is currently understood to exert a cooling effect on climate. The Twomey effect is the key driver in the effective radiative forcing due to aerosol–cloud interactions which also comprises rapid adjustments. These adjustments are essentially the responses of cloud fraction and liquid water path to ΔNd,ant and thus scale approximately with it. While the fundamental physics of the influence of added aerosol particles on the droplet concentration (Nd) is well described by established theory at the particle scale (micrometres), how this relationship is expressed at the large scale (hundreds of kilometres) ΔNd,ant remains uncertain. The discrepancy between process understanding at particle scale and insufficient quantification at the climate-relevant large scale is caused by co-variability of aerosol particles and vertical wind and by droplet sink processes. These operate at scales on the order of 10s of metres at which only localized observations are available and at which no approach exists yet to quantify the anthropogenic perturbation. Different atmospheric models suggest diverse magnitudes of the Twomey effect even when applying the same anthropogenic aerosol emission perturbation. Thus, observational data are needed to quantify and constrain the Twomey effect. At the global scale, this means satellite data. There are three key uncertainties in determining ΔNd,ant, namely the quantification (i) of the cloud-active aerosol – the cloud condensation nuclei concentrations (CCN) at or above cloud base –, (ii) of Nd, as well as (iii) the statistical approach for inferring the sensitivity of Nd to aerosol particles from the satellite data. A fourth uncertainty, the anthropogenic perturbation to CCN concentrations, is also not easily accessible from observational data. This review discusses deficiencies of current approaches for the different aspects of the problem and proposes several ways forward: In terms of CCN, retrievals of optical quantities such as aerosol optical depth suffer from a lack of vertical resolution, size and hygroscopicity information, the non-direct relation to the concentration of aerosols, the impossibility to quantify it within or below clouds, and the problem of insufficient sensitivity at low concentrations, in addition to retrieval errors. A future path forward can include utilizing colocated polarimeter and lidar instruments, ideally including high spectral resolution lidar capability at two wavelengths to maximize vertically resolved size distribution information content. In terms of Nd, a key problem is the lack of operational retrievals of this quantity, and the inaccuracy of the retrieval especially in broken-cloud regimes. As for the Nd – to – CCN sensitivity, key issues are the updraught distributions and the role of Nd sink processes, for which empirical assessments for specific cloud regimes are currently the best solutions. These considerations point to the conclusion that past studies using existing approaches have likely underestimated the true sensitivity and, thus, the radiative forcing due to the Twomey effect.

Authors 24

  1. Johannes Quaas corresponding

    Leipzig University

    Affiliation as printed

    Universität Leipzig , Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

    Universität Leipzig, Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

  2. Finnish Meteorological Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Finnish Meteorological Institute

  3. Goddard Institute for Space Studies

    Affiliation as printed

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York

  4. University of Oxford

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Oxford

  5. Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research , Leipzig

    Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig

  6. Stockholm University · Bolin Centre for Climate Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Stockholm University , Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research

    Stockholm University, Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research

  7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Affiliation as printed

    NOAA Boulder

  8. Goddard Institute for Space Studies

    Affiliation as printed

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York

  9. Imperial College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Space and Atmospheric Physics Group , Imperial College London

    Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, Imperial College London

  10. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research , Utrecht

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht

  11. University of Maryland, College Park

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Maryland , College Park

    University of Maryland, College Park

  12. Finnish Meteorological Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Finnish Meteorological Institute

  13. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland

  14. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland

  15. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences , Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas , Patras , Greece

    School of Architeture , Civil & Environmental Engineering , Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne , Switzerland

    Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Patras, Greece

    School of Architeture, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

  16. University of Michigan

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Michigan , Ann Arbor

    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  17. Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Affiliation as printed

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

  18. Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research , Leipzig

    Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig

  19. Goddard Institute for Space Studies · Universities Space Research Association

    Affiliation as printed

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York

    Universities Space Research Association (USRA) , Columbia , MD 21046 , USA

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York

    Universities Space Research Association (USRA), Columbia, MD 21046, USA

  20. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Université de Lille · Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique

    Affiliation as printed

    Université de Lille , CNRS , UMR 8518 -LOA -Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique , Lille , France

    Université de Lille, CNRS, UMR 8518 -LOA -Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, Lille, France

  21. University of Oxford

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Oxford

  22. Leipzig University

    Affiliation as printed

    Universität Leipzig , Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

    Universität Leipzig, Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

  23. Goddard Institute for Space Studies

    Affiliation as printed

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York

    NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York

  24. Leipzig University

    Affiliation as printed

    Universität Leipzig , Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

    Universität Leipzig, Leipzig Institute for Meteorology

Cited by 2 stored of 10

2 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 89