A

Assessing China’s potential for reducing primary copper demand and associated environmental impacts in the context of energy transition and “Zero waste” policies

Waste Management, vol. 144, pp. 454–467

Abstract

To conserve resources and enhance the environmental performance, China has launched the "Zero waste" concept, focused on reutilization of solid waste and recovery of materials, including copper. Although several studies have assessed the copper demand and recycling, there is a lack of understanding on how different waste management options would potentially reduce primary copper demand and associated environmental impacts in China in the context of energy transition. This study addresses this gap in view of a transition to low-carbon energy system and the optimization of copper waste management combining MFA and LCA approaches. Six types of waste streams (C&DW, ELV, WEEE, IEW, MSW, ICW) are investigated in relation to various "Zero waste" strategies including reduction, reuse (repair, remanufacturing or refurbishment), recycling and transition from informal to formal waste management. Under present Chinese policies, reuse and recycling of copper containing products will lead to a somewhat lower dependency on primary copper in 2100 (11187Gg), as well as lower total GHG emissions (64869 Gg CO2-eq.) and cumulative energy demand (1.18x10^12 MJ). Maximizing such "Zero waste" options may lead to a further reduction, resulting in 65% potential reduction of primary copper demand, around 55% potential reduction of total GHG emissions and total cumulative energy demand in 2100. Several policy actions are proposed to provide insights into future waste management in China as well as some of the challenges involved.

Authors 7

  1. Leiden University · Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, The Hague, the Netherlands

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, The Hague, the Netherlands

  2. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

  3. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

  4. TU Wien

    Affiliation as printed

    TU Wien, Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Vienna, Austria

  5. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

  6. Ministry of Natural Resources · China University of Geosciences · China University of Geosciences (Beijing) · Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resources

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and the Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China

    Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and the Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China

    School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

  7. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

Cited by 33 stored of 33

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 68