A

Comparison between a phenomenological approach and a morphoelasticity approach regarding the displacement of extracellular matrix

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 21, pp. 919–935

Abstract

Plastic (permanent) deformations were earlier, modeled by a phenomenological model in Peng and Vermolen (Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(6):2525-2551, 2020). In this manusctipt, we consider a more physics-based formulation that is based on morphoelasticity. We firstly introduce the morphoelasticity approach and investigate the impact of various input variables on the output parameters by sensitivity analysis. A comparison of both model formulations shows that both models give similar computational results. Furthermore, we carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the skin contraction model containing the morphoelasticity approach. Most statistical correlations from the two models are similar, however, the impact of the collagen density on the severeness of contraction is larger for the morphoelasticity model than for the phenomenological model.

Authors 3

  1. Qiyao Peng corresponding Aachen Mathematical Institute

    Leiden University · Delft University of Technology · Hasselt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Computational Mathematics Group, Discipline group Mathematics and statistics, Faculty of Science, Hasselt University, Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan Gebouw D, BE 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. Q.Peng@math.leidenuniv.nl

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands. Q.Peng@math.leidenuniv.nl

    Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, 2333 CA, Niels Bohrweg, The Netherlands. Q.Peng@math.leidenuniv.nl

    Computational Mathematics Group, Discipline group Mathematics and statistics, Faculty of Science, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg, The Netherlands

  2. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

  3. Delft University of Technology · Hasselt University

    Affiliation as printed

    Computational Mathematics Group, Discipline group Mathematics and statistics, Faculty of Science, Hasselt University, Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan Gebouw D, BE 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands

    Computational Mathematics Group, Discipline group Mathematics and statistics, Faculty of Science, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium

    Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

Cited by 2 stored of 2

2 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 26