A

Eighteen trial-level parity judgment datasets (n = 1016) from five countries: benefits of sharing unified data of cognitive tasks

Abstract

Psychological science could greatly benefit from research synthesis, especially when it comes to overcoming limitations of too small samples tested in single studies. However, initiatives aimed at sharing large, curated trial-level data from cognitive tasks remain scarce. To address this problem, we initiated a collective effort allowing to assemble and report a collection of eighteen datasets of the speeded bimanual parity judgment of single-digit numbers with response-to-key assignment flipped mid-experiment (hereafter SNARC-B-PJ). SNARC-B-PJ is one of the most popular tasks in numerical cognition and is used to evaluate the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes effect (SNARC), a hallmark effect for Spatial-Numerical Associations (SNAs) more generally. Datasets, related to both published and unpublished studies, were collected in eight labs across five countries, totaling 1016 healthy adult participants. We provide thorough documentation and a tentative outline of potential future analyses of these datasets. We also intend to expand this resource and encourage potentially interested colleagues to contribute to this database. At the same time, we generalize our approach by discussing potential benefits of building similar databases comprising data from other popular tasks used in cognitive psychology.

Authors 9

  1. Krzysztof Cipora corresponding

    Loughborough University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Mathematical Cognition , Loughborough University , Loughborough , UK

    Centre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

  2. Ghent University · Thomas More Kempen

    Affiliation as printed

    Universiteit Gent

    Department of Applied Psychology: Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Belgium

    Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium

  3. University of Luxembourg

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment , Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science , University of Luxembourg , Luxembourg

    Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

  4. University of Luxembourg · UCLouvain

    Affiliation as printed

    Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and

    Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment , Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science , University of Luxembourg , Luxembourg

    Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

  5. Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Neurology , University Clinic , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen Germany

    Department of Neurology, University Clinic, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen Germany

  6. UCLouvain

    Affiliation as printed

    Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and

    Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

  7. University of Luxembourg

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

  8. University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology , University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany

    LEAD Graduate School & Research Network , University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany

    Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

    LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Cited by 3 stored of 3

3 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 35