Eighteen trial-level parity judgment datasets (n = 1016) from five countries: benefits of sharing unified data of cognitive tasks
Abstract
Psychological science could greatly benefit from research synthesis, especially when it comes to overcoming limitations of too small samples tested in single studies. However, initiatives aimed at sharing large, curated trial-level data from cognitive tasks remain scarce. To address this problem, we initiated a collective effort allowing to assemble and report a collection of eighteen datasets of the speeded bimanual parity judgment of single-digit numbers with response-to-key assignment flipped mid-experiment (hereafter SNARC-B-PJ). SNARC-B-PJ is one of the most popular tasks in numerical cognition and is used to evaluate the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes effect (SNARC), a hallmark effect for Spatial-Numerical Associations (SNAs) more generally. Datasets, related to both published and unpublished studies, were collected in eight labs across five countries, totaling 1016 healthy adult participants. We provide thorough documentation and a tentative outline of potential future analyses of these datasets. We also intend to expand this resource and encourage potentially interested colleagues to contribute to this database. At the same time, we generalize our approach by discussing potential benefits of building similar databases comprising data from other popular tasks used in cognitive psychology.
Authors 9
-
Krzysztof Cipora corresponding
Affiliation as printed
Centre for Mathematical Cognition , Loughborough University , Loughborough , UK
Centre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
-
Ghent University · Thomas More Kempen
Affiliation as printed
Universiteit Gent
Department of Applied Psychology: Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Belgium
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
-
Affiliation as printed
Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment , Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science , University of Luxembourg , Luxembourg
Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
-
University of Luxembourg · UCLouvain
Affiliation as printed
Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and
Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment , Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science , University of Luxembourg , Luxembourg
Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
-
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · RWTH Aachen University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Neurology , University Clinic , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen Germany
Department of Neurology, University Clinic, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and
Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
-
Affiliation as printed
Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Science, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
-
Affiliation as printed
Department of Psychology , University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network , University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
Cited by 3 stored of 3
3 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).