A

Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Improving Medication Adherence for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Asthma: Systematic Review (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Poor treatment adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma is a global public health concern with severe consequences in terms of patient health and societal costs. A potentially promising tool for addressing poor compliance is eHealth. OBJECTIVE This review investigates the effects of eHealth interventions on medication adherence in patients with COPD or asthma. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases of Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase for studies with publication dates between January 1, 2000, and October 29, 2020. We selected randomized controlled trials targeting adult patients with COPD or asthma, which evaluated the effectiveness of an eHealth intervention on medication adherence. The risk of bias in the included studies was examined using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. The results were narratively reviewed. RESULTS In total, six studies focusing on COPD and seven focusing on asthma were analyzed. Interventions were mostly internet-based or telephone-based, and could entail telemonitoring of symptoms and medication adherence, education, counseling, consultations, and self-support modules. Control groups mostly comprised usual care conditions, whereas a small number of studies used a face-to-face intervention or waiting list as the control condition. For COPD, the majority of eHealth interventions were investigated as an add-on to usual care (5/6 studies), whereas for asthma the majority of interventions were investigated as a standalone intervention (5/7 studies). Regarding eHealth interventions targeting medication adherence for COPD, two studies reported nonsignificant effects, one study found a significant effect in comparison to usual care, and three reported mixed results. Of the seven studies that investigated eHealth interventions targeting medication adherence in asthma, three studies found significant effects, two reported nonsignificant effects, and two reported mixed effects. CONCLUSIONS The mixed results on the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in improving treatment adherence for asthma and COPD are presumably related to the type, context, and intensity of the interventions, as well as to differences in the operationalization and measurement of adherence outcomes. Much remains to be learned about the potential of eHealth to optimize treatment adherence in COPD and asthma.

Authors 6

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  2. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

    National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands

  3. Radboud University Nijmegen · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  4. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology Vrije Universiteit Medical Faculty Van der Boechorststraat 7 Amsterdam, 1081 BT Netherlands

  5. Zorginstituut Nederland

    Affiliation as printed

    Dutch National Healthcare Institute, Diemen, Netherlands

  6. Heleen M. Riper corresponding

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · GGZ inGeest

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical, Neuro-and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Research and Innovation, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 46